This was the question I sat with for a long time before I started investing. I went back and forth and eventually made a decision. There's no universally correct answer because it depends on your own situation, but at least I know the numbers now.
What is the MSCI World?
The MSCI World Index tracks around 1,400 companies across 23 developed countries. It is the most popular index for passive investing globally and is considered the standard building block for long-term wealth creation. Well-known ETFs include the iShares Core MSCI World and Xtrackers MSCI World.
What is the S&P 500?
The S&P 500 contains the 500 largest publicly listed US companies, from Apple and Microsoft to Berkshire Hathaway. It is the world's most important stock market index and the benchmark for the US economy.
Returns compared
Historically, the S&P 500 has marginally outperformed the MSCI World in most periods, mainly due to the strength of the US dollar and the dominance of American tech companies.
Historical returns compared (approx. p.a., in USD/EUR)
S&P 500: ~10–11% p.a. (last 30 years)
MSCI World: ~8–9% p.a. (last 30 years)
$200/month for 30 years at 9% → approx. $367,000
$200/month for 30 years at 10% → approx. $452,000
Difference: ~$85,000, but past returns are no guarantee of future performance.
Diversification: US concentration risk?
The most common criticism of the S&P 500: 100% US exposure. But consider this: the MSCI World is already ~70% US stocks. The diversification benefit of the MSCI World is real, but smaller than most people think.
Costs (TER) compared
Typical costs (TER)
S&P 500 ETFs: 0.03–0.07% p.a. (e.g. iShares Core S&P 500: 0.07%)
MSCI World ETFs: 0.12–0.20% p.a. (e.g. iShares Core MSCI World: 0.20%)
Over 30 years on a $50,000 investment, a 0.13% difference amounts to roughly $2,000–$3,000.
Which ETF suits you?
S&P 500 if you:
- Believe in the long-term strength of the US economy
- Want the lowest possible costs
- Want direct exposure to the world's largest tech companies
MSCI World if you:
- Want broader diversification across 23 countries
- Don't want to depend entirely on the US economy
- Prefer the classic "global portfolio" approach